The senior executive team soon began using it monthly to track results, immediately see where assumptions were or weren't being met, and understand the variance drivers. This helped them make frequent, necessary decisions to consistently meet or exceed targets.
The key operational shift was realizing we needed to adjust their annual planning to precede the financial forecast submission to the owners. This ensured the annual plan guided the financial forecast, not the reverse. Quarterly Targets and Priorities With a monthly operating and financial forecast established, the team could easily pull numbers to set clear monthly and quarterly volume and financial targets, essential for checking that results were on track. We also initiated the practice of setting 90-day priorities for change, improvement, and growth each quarter, drawing from their annual priorities in their One Page Strategic Plan. Initially, these priorities were 'rough'—ambiguous goals, a mix of company-wide and department-level focus, and a general feeling of overload. This is a common starting point. To address this, the team got more rigorous: they got clearer on their ultimate aim for each priority, created detailed action plans to understand scope and contribution, and distinguished true senior executive Company Priorities from department priorities and day-to-day work. This newfound clarity supported the senior executive team and their own team members in executing company-wide changes and departmental improvements with greater confidence and accountability. An Executive Team Meeting Rhythm The Senior Executive Team fully embraced quarterly planning, making these sessions a standard part of their operating rhythm. In the second year, we adjusted the quarterly planning to get more rigorous with quarterly priorities. The team also adopted a full communication rhythm to solve problems and keep their quarterly plans on track:
Initially, both the Senior Executive Team and the broader Leadership Team members attended the quarterly planning and monthly check-ins. This was because the initial annual planning session included a broad group of leaders from which the senior executive team was then selected. The joint group continued to meet for quarterly planning and monthly checkins to keep the newly formed leadership team bought into the change and to help inform the senior executive team, who were mostly newer to the company. However, over time this structure proved sub-optimal: it clouded accountability, muddied the planning, and hindered true senior executive team cohesion by making the group too large for focused debate.
If you are a prairie CEO who wants to grow a thriving company, team and life more quickly, more easily and with less stress and headache, please contact me here.
Comments are closed.
|
Archives
December 2029
Categories
All
|
RSS Feed